Skip to contentContribute to ReadWriteThink / RSS / FAQs / Site Demonstrations / Contact Us / About Us

 

 

Contribute to ReadWriteThink

ReadWriteThink couldn't publish all of this great content without literacy experts to write and review for us. If you've got lessons plans, videos, activities, or other ideas you'd like to contribute, we'd love to hear from you.

More

 

Professional Development

Find the latest in professional publications, learn new techniques and strategies, and find out how you can connect with other literacy professionals.

More

 

Did You Know?

Your students can save their work with Student Interactives.

More more

HomeClassroom ResourcesLesson Plans

Lesson Plan

Literary Characters on Trial: Combining Persuasion and Literary Analysis

E-mail / Share / Print This Page / Print All Materials (Note: Handouts must be printed separately)

 

Literary Characters on Trial: Combining Persuasion and Literary Analysis

Grades 6 – 8
Lesson Plan Type Unit
Estimated Time Eight 50-minute sessions
Lesson Author

Jacqueline Podolski

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Publisher

National Council of Teachers of English

 

Student Objectives

Session One: Introducing the Project

Session Two: Brainstorming for the Project and Selecting Roles

Session Three: Roles, Rules and Research

Session Four to Six: Research and Rehearsal

Session Seven: Present Cases

Session Eight: Evaluation and Reflection

Extensions

Student Assessment/Reflections

 

STUDENT OBJECTIVES

Students will

  • demonstrate comprehension of the class reading.

  • create interpretive presentations of literary characters.
  • apply previous knowledge of persuasive devices to a writing piece and a presentation.

  • articulate persuasive arguments about literature.

  • compose an essay using a persuasive style.

  • find, interpret, and manipulate textual evidence to support one side of an argument.

  • work effectively with other students.

  • demonstrate effective oral presentation skills.

  • analyze the quality of information used to support an argument.

  • critically assess their own work.

back to top

 

Session One: Introducing the Project

  1. Ask students to share what they know about courts, trials, and roles of the people involved with the class. Take notes as needed.

  2. Invite the students to share examples of trials-in the media, books, movies, and so forth.

  3. Ask the students to identify the similarities and differences between the trials presented in these different media.

  4. Explain the mock trial activity to the class: Students will participate in a trial, inspired by situations in a piece of literature they have read recently. In addition, they will write a persuasive piece that documents the support for the arguments presented in the trial.

  5. Using computers with Internet access, invite the students to explore sites where they can learn more about terms and routines related to trials using the online Exploring the Judicial System through a Literary Mock Trial.

  6. Explain the roles of each member involved in the trial.

back to top

 

Session Two: Brainstorming for the Project and Selecting Roles

  1. When students have experience with the legal vocabulary and related information as well as roles in trials, invite them to brainstorm characters and situations from their current piece of literature that would warrant a trial. If desired, create an example to begin the discussion.

  2. As students brainstorm, record their ideas, creating a poster for each character who could be involved with a trial. Record the character's name as the main heading over a two-column chart-one for crimes, the other for motivation. Hang the charts around the room so the groups can use their during later sessions.

  3. Divide the class into small groups of four to five students each.

  4. Continue gathering information on the character criminals and their crimes by having students move through the room, from poster to poster, providing information. Students can list potential crimes-anything the character did that caused problems in the reading. For example, in The Tempest, Prospero from could be tried for keeping Ariel and Caliban as slaves and entrapping his enemies. In The Giver, Jonas could be tried for questioning the values of his society. Students can also list any conflict caused or created by the selected characters that could be considered a crime.

  5. After every group has had a chance to list potential "crimes", the groups move around the room again to fill in the motivation the character may have had to commit the "crimes". Make sure that the motivations are recorded next to the appropriate character so it is clear which motivation is related to which crime. In The Tempest, for instance, Prospero's motivation for enslaving Caliban could be that Caliban's savageness was dangerous to Prospero and Miranda. In The Giver, Jonas questioned his society because it abandoned (killed) imperfect citizens.

  6. After the students have filled out the character charts, ask them to examine all of the information that has been compiled.

  7. When students have completed work on the charts, invite each group to choose a character to try at the mock trial.

  8. After the characters have been selected, remind students of the roles to pursue and ask each group member to choose a role for the trial. Alternatively, you can assign individual characters along with a role to each group by distributing cards with the character's name and either "defend" or "prosecute" randomly.

  9. Give students who choose to be lawyers either the Prosecution Attorney's Duties or Defense Attorney's Duties handout so that they have a better idea of their specific expectations. You can also share with the students suggestions about composing and asking questions.

  10. Since all students will act as a jury, discuss the Jury Verdict Form to the students.

back to top

 

Session Three: Roles, Rules and Research

  1. Once characters and roles have been selected or assigned, discuss the expectations and requirements of the trial and the accompanying persuasive writing piece.

  2. Go over the Paper Rubric, highlighting the details that need to be included in the papers and how they and will be assessed.

  3. Examine the Trial Rubric, which will be used to evaluate students' participation in the trial.

  4. As the students review the rubrics, invite them to define the key terms which are typical to most rubrics-such as "clear", "evident", "maintain", and "interprets."

  5. When the students understand what the targets are from the rubrics, pass out the model defense handout.

  6. Use the model defense handout to show students see how to build a case.

  7. Walk students through the process, using a think-aloud process that demonstrates for students why you chose the main arguments, how you found information in the text, and how you put it together in a summary of the case.

  8. After students understand the model defense handout and the process involved, invite them to assess the model defense using the Paper Rubric.

  9. Invite the students to share their final score and the reasons that they chose that score. Students can also explain how the score could be improved.

  10. When the students feel comfortable with the expectations for the project, invite them to begin their research and outline their cases for the mock trial.

  11. Hand out an agenda to the students so they know the timeframe for the mock trial.

back to top

 

Session Four to Six: Research and Rehearsal

  1. During these sessions, assist students as they compose their persuasive pieces and begin putting together their presentations for the mock trial.

  2. Demonstrate the Persuasion Map and explore how the tool can be used to outline and structure arguments for the trial. Make sure that the students print out a hard copy at the end of each session, as the data cannot be saved.

  3. Guide students as they decide which points to include, who will be presenting each point, and how to best deliver their portion.

  4. At the beginning of each session, review the Paper Rubric and Trial Rubric so students can ask any questions about the project that emerge as they work.

  5. Focus Session Six primarily on rehearsal. If students created a Persuasion Map, it would be useful to demonstrate how to use the printouts like note cards for the mock trial and presentation.

back to top

 

Session Seven: Present Cases

  1. Before presentations begin, review the Jury Verdict Form with the class, reminding students of the information they need to record during the trial.

  2. Students present their arguments, following the guidelines and agenda presented in previous sessions.

  3. At the end of the first day of presentations, collect the Jury Verdict Forms, and let the students know that the verdicts will be delivered the following day.

back to top

 

Session Eight: Evaluation and Reflection

  1. Complete any unfinished trials at the beginning of the session.

  2. When all of the trials have been presented, pass out and explain the Self-Evaluation Form.

  3. Allow students time to complete the form in class. Stress that thoughtful answers are more important than quick answers.

  4. Collect the Self-Evaluation Forms when they are completed.

  5. After everyone has finished their Self-Evaluation Forms, present the results of the verdicts to the students.

  6. Allow time for students to discuss the trials and verdicts. If needed, prompt with questions such as, "What verdict surprised you? Why?"

  7. As the discussion continues, further assess students' understanding of the plot elements and characterization, as revealed in their comments and observations.

back to top

 

EXTENSIONS

  • As a class, view an appropriate trial from TV, such as Law and Order, or a movies, such as Inherit the Wind or To Kill a Mockingbird. Use the rubric to assess the work of the people involved in the depicted trial.

  • Use the online version of The Tempest to demonstrate how to use the Find command in an Internet browser to search the text for evidence for their argument. For instance, search for all instances of the word slave to identify quotations to support an argument about Prospero's crime of keeping Ariel as a slave.

  • Get ideas for other mock trials from Jury Trials for the Classroom.

back to top

 

STUDENT ASSESSMENT/REFLECTIONS

 

  • As students discuss characters and situations from the text, listen for comments that indicate students are identifying specific evidence from the story that connects to their trial. The connections that they make between the details in the novel and the details they choose as their supporting reasons for their mock trial and persuaive writing piece will reveal their understanding and engagement with the novel.

  • Monitor student interaction and progress during group work to assess social skills and assist any students having problems with the project.

  • Use the Trial Rubric to assess group presentations.

  • Use the Paper Rubric to assess the persuasive writing pieces.

  • Use the Jury Verdict Forms and the corresponding discussions to listen for further connections to the texts in the mock trials.

  • Respond to the content and quality of students’ thoughts in their Self-Evaluations on the project. Look for indications that the student provides supporting evidence for the mock trial, applying the lessons learned from the work with the Persuasion Map and persuasive writing pieces.

 

back to top