ReadWriteThink couldn't publish all of this great content without literacy experts to write and review for us. If you've got lessons plans, videos, activities, or other ideas you'd like to contribute, we'd love to hear from you.
Find the latest in professional publications, learn new techniques and strategies, and find out how you can connect with other literacy professionals.
Teacher Resources by Grade
|1st - 2nd||3rd - 4th|
|5th - 6th||7th - 8th|
|9th - 10th||11th - 12th|
What Are My Rights? Exploring and Writing About the Constitution
|Grades||9 – 12|
|Lesson Plan Type||Standard Lesson|
|Estimated Time||Three 1-hour sessions|
New Haven, Connecticut
- Analyze the constitutionality of youth curfews using the First Amendment as a resource to explore both sides of the issue
- Research and synthesize opinions about this topic and use this information to create a public statement from the perspective of a character interested in the curfew issue
- Apply what they have learned to write an argument either for or against a youth curfew in their own community
- Define the characteristics of blog entries and then demonstrate comprehension by writing their own
- Evaluate each other's work, both in a peer review and by commenting on posts in a class blog
Before the class arrives, write the following question on the board: Do local governments have the right to impose curfews on citizens under the age of 18?
|1.||Students should write a response to the question for five minutes.
|2.||Coordinate a pair-share discussion. After three minutes, pairs join and make groups of four, and continue discussing the issue for a few more minutes. Groups of four will join and make groups of eight as students continue to listen to other viewpoints on the topic. Eventually the entire class will regroup having heard a variety of opinions. Some students might make reference to the First Amendment in this discussion. Use this to transition into the next part of the lesson.
|3.||Have students get into their original pairs and use the National Constitution Center: Interactive Constitution: First Amendment website to read both the text of the First Amendment and the explanatory text that appears beneath it. After reading, have students identify and summarize each clause of the amendment. Review responses while individual students write clause summaries on chart paper in the front of the room for reference.
|4.||After a brief discussion of the individual clauses and summaries, have students work independently to analyze the First Amendment by writing a one-paragraph response to the question: What is the purpose of the First Amendment?
|5.||Ask students to reconsider the opening question but pose the question in new ways. For example:
|6.||Students should get into the groups of four they met with at the beginning of the session and brainstorm as many reasons as possible for both sides of the debate about curfews. Explain clearly that they should keep an open mind as they work to recognize the validity of both sides of the argument. They can use A Status Report on Youth Curfews in America's Cities to supplement their own ideas and discover additional reasons for and against a curfew. Each group should construct a large chart outlining both reasons for and against youth curfews. Students can use a bulleted format for the brainstorm chart, and all reasons should be written in their own words. When they are finished, students should hang their charts at the front of the room.
|7.||Challenge students to choose the most compelling reason, either for or against a youth curfew, from the lists. As the closing "exit ticket" for the class, each student will write on a small piece of paper the reason they find most compelling either for or against a youth curfew and briefly explain why they chose this reason.
Note: "Exit tickets" give a sense of closure to the class and will allow you to informally assess individual student's understanding. Students should hand their tickets to you at the door before exiting the classroom.
|1.||Greet students at the classroom door and hand each one a role-play card as they enter (see Preparation, Step 3). Once each student has a card, explain that they should work independently to decide where the person on their card would stand on the issue of a youth curfew. Students can look at the news articles you bookmarked (see Preparation, Step 2) to find ideas that supplement their initial thoughts.
|2.||After working briefly on their own, students should team up with other students who have the same role-play card. Each small group will work together and write a public statement from the perspective of their character. You should establish the setting and the audience for the public statement before students begin their work. Explain that they are writing in preparation for a public forum or a meeting in which people express their point of view on an issue relevant to them and their community. Write a list of all the identities on the role-play cards on the board so students can see them and know who is in their audience. You should circulate to make sure that students use the news articles to supplement their own writing.
|3.||Review the rules of the debate with the class (see Preparation, Step 6). Offer students the chance to add to or modify these rules. Explain to students that they will be evaluated on the strength of their arguments, as well as on how closely they follow the rules of the debate. Their public statements must demonstrate an awareness of both sides of the issue and the audience.
|4.||Hold a mock public forum in which students present their statements and debate the issue of a youth curfew from the perspectives of the various characters.
|5.||Hold a brief closing discussion in which students consider the possibility of a curfew where they live. Questions for discussion include:
Homework (due at the beginning of Session 3): Using the concluding discussion as a starting point, students should write an argument either for or against a youth curfew in their city or town. Their audience is similarly aged students who are studying the issue. You may want to divide the class into two groups, assigning one position to each, to make sure you have arguments for both sides.
|1.||Show students the blog you have created and talk about how blogs can serve as forums for opinion. Inform students that blogs are often based on a theme or topic and interested participants can think, write, and post directly about this specific issue. Since blogs are current discussions of topical matters, blog entries should always include a date and a heading. Make sure students understand that blogs also have space for visitors to leave comments about the entries. If possible, show students some sample blogs (see Preparation, Step 5). Tell them they will each be working to prepare a post to publish on the blog.
|2.||Students should use the paragraphs they wrote for homework to help them write the first draft of their blog entry. Before students begin to work, present and discuss what a good persuasive blog entry should include:
|3.||Students should work with a partner to edit the first draft of their paragraphs. Circulate and meet with each team to help keep them on track. Students should use the guidelines you wrote on the board to help them review each other's work.
|4.||Once revisions are complete, each student should post his or her position statement to the blog.
|5.||Talk about blog comments. Comments are what make blogs unique and interactive; they offer readers an opportunity to express agreement or disagreement with a point of view presented. A good comment makes reference to a specific point in the blog and either supports or refutes it with additional evidence.
Homework: Each student should comment on at least two other blog posts.
Schedule a whole-class review of the blog comments a few days after the conclusion of the lesson. You can also return to the text of the First Amendment and pose the following question for discussion: Does the First Amendment's protection of "freedom of expression" apply to 21st-century technologies like websites and blogs?
- Review students’ charts from Session 1. Students should be able to move beyond a one-sided analysis of a youth curfew and see the issue from a variety of perspectives.
- Review students’ one-paragraph analyses of the purpose of the First Amendment.
- Students should demonstrate an understanding of the spirit and meaning of this amendment.
- Review exit tickets from Session 1. Students should begin to take a stand on the youth curfew issue.
- Review students’ statements and evaluate each team’s performance at the public forum in Session 2 on the strength of their arguments, how closely they followed the rules of the debate, how well they demonstrate an understanding of both sides of the issue, and how well they acknowledge and address the audience.
- Evaluate students’ blog entries and comments using the criteria outlined in Session 3.