|
|
|
|
| Overview |
In this lesson, students read and analyze sonnets to discover
their traditional forms. Students chart the characteristics of the poems then
review the details for similarities, deducing traditional sonnet forms that the
poems have in common. After this introduction, students write original sonnets,
using one of the poems they have analyzed as a model.
|
| From Theory to Practice |
Albert Somers, author of Teaching Poetry in High School, asserts that
the “business
of structure seems to be the poetry teacher’s
greatest bugaboo” (145). We find ourselves searching for a balance between “analyzing
poetry to death” and “voices [that] clamor for the teaching of culture
and art and the way art—including poetry—works” (145). Teachers
are left trying to find the instructional technique that reaches that balance.
Somers explains:
The most prevailing
approach is deductive: define the terms, give examples, and have the students
find them in poems. In some ways, the method is logical and efficient. Yet year
after year, most of our students barely tolerate our efforts. Few recall it with
affection, and fewer reflect upon it later as a source of insight and inspiration.
(146)
Somers suggests that teachers use the opposite strategy: “Instead of definitions,
begin with generalizations. Actually begin with specifics (poems) that lead to
generalizations—inductive teaching” (146). This lesson adopts just
such an inductive strategy, providing students with examples of the sonnet form
and asking them to find the similar characteristics that unite the poems. In
the process, students determine the form of traditional sonnets.
Further Reading
Somers, Albert B. Teaching Poetry in High School. Urbana, IL: NCTE,
1999.
Probst, Robert E. “Reader-Response Theory and the English Curriculum.” English
Journal 83.3 (March 1994): 37-44.
|
| Student Objectives |
Students will
- discover the forms of traditional sonnets through analysis.
- learn terms describing the elements of sonnets.
- compose an original sonnet
based on their discovered format.
|
| Instructional Plan |
Resources
Preparation
- Arrange for online access to read the traditional sonnets listed above. Otherwise,
make copies of the sonnets listed above or identify sonnets in your class texts
that students can use for this project.
- Decide how to distribute the poems to your students. There are enough poems
for five groups of students to each analyze three poems. Ideally, assign groups
sonnets from a range of time periods (e.g., assigning a group a poem by Shakespeare,
Frost, and Shelley rather than only sonnets by Frost or only sonnets by Shakespeare).
Remember that the Gwendolyn Brooks’ poem “the
sonnet-ballad” is used for the class demonstration, so it does not
need to be assigned to a group.
- Test the Interactive
Sonnet Characteristics Chart on your
computers to familiarize yourself with the tool and ensure that you have the
Flash plug-in installed. You can download the plug-in from the technical
support page.
- (optional) If computer access is limited, make copies of the Sonnet
Characteristics Chart for students, in lieu of the interactive version.
Instruction and Activities
Session One
- Read “the
sonnet-ballad” by Gwendolyn Brooks, or another that you have chosen, aloud
to the class.
- Begin discussion of the poem by asking students what stands out to them about
the poem. Ask them what they remember, feel, question, and see when they read
and hear the poem. Stress
that there are no wrong answers.
- Ask students to share personal experiences, emotions, and beliefs that
influenced their reaction. Ask students if the poem recalls memories and how
it connects to their own attitudes or perceptions.
- Ask students to point to specific words and lines in the poem that triggered
their reactions. Work to shift students’ attention to the details and
features of the poem by asking them what word, phrase, image, or idea were
important to their reactions.
- If students have not mentioned any of the craft elements of the poem as they
have responded, turn their attention to these features now. Ask students to
point out the poetic features that they notice. Students who have had exposure
to the forms before will likely notice the poem’s title. Allow students
to share any details they recall about the sonnet form, but do not push them
to recall the characteristics.
- Explain that the poem is, in fact, a kind of sonnet, and that during the
remainder of the class, students will explore other sonnets in order to determine
what makes a sonnet a sonnet.
- Project the Interactive
Sonnet Characteristics Chart
so that you can demonstrate the tool, or pass out copies of the Sonnet Characteristics
Chart.
- Model the process of recording characteristics for a sonnet, using the Brooks’ poem.
- Arrange students into five groups, and assign each group three sonnets to
read and record data for. Ideally, assign each group sonnets from more than
one time period.
- As students work, move from group to group to check
on their progress, offering feedback and support as appropriate.
- If groups have not completed their work by the end of the session, extend
research time into the next
session.
- When students have completed their analysis of the sonnets they were assigned,
ask them to look over their charts and draw some preliminary conclusions about
what the poems have in common based on their observations.
Session Two
- If groups did not completed their work by the end of the previous session,
give them a few minutes at the beginning of the session to complete their
observations and draw some conclusions about the sonnets’ similarities.
- Compile all the observations that students have found on a class chart,
using chart paper or writing on the board.
- Read through the collected observations and ask students to suggest what
the poems have in common and how they differ.
- Work toward a class description that fits all the poems; then find two
more detailed definitions, based on the differences you noticed.
- Provide the formal names for the sonnet forms:
| Sonnet Form |
Rhyme Scheme |
| Italian or Petrarchan |
abbaabba cde cde
abbaabba cc dd ee
abbaabba cdcd ee
|
| Spenserian |
abab bcbc cdcd ee
|
| English or Shakespearean |
abab cdcd efef gg |
- With the poetic forms identified, read “My
mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun” (Sonnet 130) by
William Shakespeare to the class.
- Return to the observation chart to confirm the kind sonnet the poem is.
- With the form of the poem confirmed, turn to the poem's message by asking
students what stands out to them about the poem. Ask them what they remember,
feel, question, and see when they read and hear the poem. Stress that there
are no wrong answers.
- Ask students to share personal experiences, emotions, and beliefs that
influenced their reaction. Ask students if the poem recalls memories and
how it connects to their own attitudes or perceptions.
- Ask students to point to specific words and lines in the poem that triggered
their reactions. Work to shift students’ attention to the details and
features of the poem by asking them what word, phrase, image, or idea were
important to their reactions.
- Be sure that students notice the contrast and
opposition that are important to the poem’s meaning. If students need
a focused exploration of the ideas, ask them to go through the poem and create
a shared list of things that the speaker describes that the described lady’s
features are and are not.
- Turn to the meter of the lines. If students are familiar with iambic
pentameter, review Shakespeare’s use of the meter in the sonnet. If
not, simply move to the next step.
- Ask students to look at Shakespeare’s sonnet as a model for their
own writing. Write the the first line of the poem on the board or on chart
paper: “My
mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun.”
- On a separate sheet of chart paper or area of the board, rewrite the first
line of the poem with some of the words removed and with the number of beats
written below:
______________________ is/are nothing like _______________
4 beats 2
beats
- Ask students to brainstorm nouns or noun phrases that can fill in the
first blank. As students share ideas, list the alternatives on the board
or chart paper. To get students started, you can share some options of your
own such as “My mother's pies,” “The football game,” “McDonald's
fries,” and “My P. E. class.” The options do NOT need to
rhyme with the original. The goal is to match the rhythm.
- Compare the brainstormed items to the original phrase, removing any items
from the list that do not match the rhythm. Use this process to discuss the
metrical differences between phrases that match and those that don’t.
- Explain that students can change the verb to match the meaning of their
poem. If desired, brainstorm a list of options (e.g., is, are, was, were).
- Next, move to options for the second blank in the line. Return to the earlier
discussion of the poem’s meaning. Ask students to suggest how the noun
phrase that fills in the last blank compares to the image or idea in the
first blank—what
kind of comparison is the poet making?
- Again, ask students to brainstorm a list of words, this time for the second
blank. Get started by sharing some possible answers such as “a ham,” “my
chair,” “the tape,” and “her cake.”
- Focus students’ attention
on brainstorming based on the meter, without worrying about how the noun
phrases match up to the items that they have brainstormed for the first blank.
- At this point, students will have a list of words and ideas to start their
own poems. Create a sample replacement line, using options that students
have brainstormed (e.g., “My mother's pies are nothing like her cake”).
- Once you’re sure that students understand the activity, give them
the rest of the session to work on their own sonnets, imitating “My
mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun.” Remind students
that in addition to matching the rhythm of the original poem, their work
should also match the rhyme scheme.
- It may be useful for students to begin their own poems by choosing a topic,
and then brainstorming a list of comparison words, ideas, and images that
describe things that their topic is and is not. They can then turn to this
list as they work on their own poem. This process will allow students to
focus first on the meaning of their poems, and then shift to matching ideas
to the rhythm (rather than asking them to do both at once).
- Circulate among students as they work, providing support and feedback.
- Ask students to continue work on their sonnets for homework and to come
to the next session with a finished draft that they are ready to share.
The draft will be shared and revised, so it need not be a polished, finished
piece.
Session Three
- Give students a few minutes to make any last-minute changes to their drafts.
- Arrange students in small groups and pass out copies of the Shakespearean
Sonnet Checklist.
- In groups, have students exchange sonnets so that every group member has
a sonnet other than their own.
- Students read through the sonnets silently, to prepare to read the poems
aloud, and to fill
out the checklist with preliminary comments.
- Once all group members are ready, have students read the sonnets aloud
to the group, listening specifically for the rhythm.
- If students are unsure whether a line uses the right rhythm, have one group
member read the line from Shakespeare’s poem while another member reads
the corresponding line from the original poem. Any places where the rhythm
is off should become clear from this test. Group members can help one another
by making suggestions to fit the rhythm of the model.
- Once students have worked through the sonnets of all group members, have
them work on revisions and creating a final draft of the poems. Encourage
group members to share changes and ask questions as they work.
- With 5–10 minutes left in class, ask student volunteers to share
their sonnets with the whole class.
- Collect the sonnets for evaluation based on checklist. Alternately, if
students need additional time to create their polished sonnets, allow them
to work on their poems for homework and prepare a draft to submit at the
beginning of the next class.
Extensions
- Now that students have created their own poems modeled on Shakespeare’s
sonnet, move to a more sophisticated
exploration of the rhythm of sonnets, by completing the EDSITEment lesson
plan, Listening
to Poetry: Sounds of the Sonnet. Since students have internalized the
rhythm of iambic pentameter, the formal analysis and labeling of the structure
is a natural extension.
- For a more detailed exploration of Emma Lazarus’ sonnet, “The New
Colossus,” follow
this lesson with the EDSITEment lesson, The
Statue of Liberty: Bringing the ‘New Colossus’ to
America.
Web Resources
- William
Shakespeare, from the Academy of American Poets
http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/122
- Read additional sonnets by William Shakespeare, as well biographical information
about the bard.
- September 26: Sonnet
http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/5791
- A calendar entry dealing with types of sonnets, attributes, and variations.
- “I am a pirate with a wooden leg”:
Stomping Iambic Pentameter
http://www.folger.edu/eduLesPlanDtl.cfm?lpid=692
- This lesson plan from the Folger Shakespeare Library outlines the process
of having students use body movement to learn the rhythm of iambic pentameter.
|
| Student Assessment/Reflections |
As students discuss traditional sonnets and their own poems, listen for
comments that indicate that students understand the characteristics of the
traditional sonnet forms. Provide supportive feedback for observations that
show students are making connections between the forms and their own writing.
Informal feedback from student groups, as they read one another’s sonnets,
provides students with the reactions of a audience of readers. For formal assessment,
use the Shakespearean Sonnet Checklist which is
tied to the key characteristics of the form.
|
1 - Students read a wide range of print and nonprint texts to build an understanding of texts, of themselves, and of the cultures of the United States and the world; to acquire new information; to respond to the needs and demands of society and the workplace; and for personal fulfillment. Among these texts are fiction and nonfiction, classic and contemporary works.
3 - Students apply a wide range of strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate, and appreciate texts. They draw on their prior experience, their interactions with other readers and writers, their knowledge of word meaning and of other texts, their word identification strategies, and their understanding of textual features (e.g., sound-letter correspondence, sentence structure, context, graphics).
6 - Students apply knowledge of language structure, language conventions (e.g., spelling and punctuation), media techniques, figurative language, and genre to create, critique, and discuss print and nonprint texts.
|
|
|